<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 8/3/2010 5:21 PM, Mattias Mattsson wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTinkAdoA8n_DItR5Ak6HXUnHUdAGC5zN7wxp85LY@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 15:54, pat-lkml <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pat-lkml@erley.org"><pat-lkml@erley.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This is a new success report for this board, with the latest SVN. Of note,
I never had to use -p internal:boardenable=force to make it work.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
It seems that the board enable for Asus A8N gets a (unintentional)
match also for the A8N-SLI Premium.
I have neither of these boards, but here are two samples of lspci
output for the "plain" A8N I found after some googling:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com/msg1633624.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com/msg1633624.html</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://forum.debian-fr.org/viewtopic.php?t=19786">http://forum.debian-fr.org/viewtopic.php?t=19786</a>
The set of PCI ID:s for these two boards (A8N/A8N-SLI Premium) seems
to be identical so maybe DMI matching is needed for the A8N board
enable?
Unfortunately I am unable to find any dmidecode output for this board
by searching booth google and the flashrom mailing list archives.
The earliest reference to the A8N board enable I could find is here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2009-December/001309.html">http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2009-December/001309.html</a>
-mattias
</pre>
</blockquote>
Attached is my dmidecode. Of note, the A8N line is cross flashable,
even so far as people with the A8N-SE reporting having the Marvell lan
chip on the motherboard, but without an actual RJ45 port for it. I
don't have access to the code ATM, but is it possible that this board's
boardenable is actually the same as the chipset enable?<br>
<br>
Pat<br>
</body>
</html>