[flashrom] [PATCH 0/6] Initial status register and access protection infrastructure

Hatim Kanchwala hatim at hatimak.me
Tue Jul 5 22:27:59 CEST 2016


Hi,

Following patches add new infrastructure for status register(s) and locking/unlocking of access protection. Detailed points for explaining each patch are included within them. 

Some general thoughts -
- The code has a lot TODOs and FIXMEs (most of which I have addressed to myself). They are short-term targets and represent the work-in-progress nature of the patches. Future revisions will resolve them.
- There are a lot of comments. Eventually much of that will be relocated to documentation and wiki, so comments in future revisions will shrink.
- Some CLI code is borrowed from the ChromiumOS fork (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/flashrom/). IMO, the exact words to use for the options is subjective.
- The names for struct status_register and struct wp defines (in statusreg_layouts.c and writeprotect_layouts.c respectively) are not very creative and tend to be long. I couldn't come up with a generic scheme that captures most of the information regarding it. You are welcome to offer creative suggestions ;)

Further work -
- Read and write "configuration" registers (a lot of Spansion chips have those)
- Add tested/untested status for new infrastructure similar to what we have for chips (like TEST_PREW, etc.)
  - write protection modes
  - protection ranges
- Access protection for non-SPI chips (pointed to by Stefan over IRC)
- Reuse layouts for locking/unlocking (pointed to by Stafan and David over IRC)
- Handling WPS bit (a couple of GigaDevice chips have this)
- Exotic chips (mostly Atmel, now Adesto, chips fall under this category)

This is what I particularly seek -
- Feedback on code
- Feedback on CLI
- Any other ideas that you'd like to add tu further work
- Please add support for a few chips that you might have, and if possible also test them - would like to know how cumbersome it is

Thank you for your time. I am looking forward to your feedback and having a discussion. I hope this contribution (and many more in the future) adds value to flashrom and its community.

Bye,
Hatim

Hatim Kanchwala (6):
  Status register infrastructure
  Locking/unlocking access protection infrastructure
  WIP: Add support for status register infrastructure to existing chips
  WIP: Add support for access protection infrastructure to existing
    chips
  Integrate new infrastructure with existing codebase
  Add command-line interface to expose new infrastructure

 Makefile               |   6 +-
 chipdrivers.h          |  24 +++
 cli_classic.c          | 200 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 flash.h                |  46 +++++-
 flashchips.c           | 176 +++++++++++++++++----
 flashrom.8.tmpl        |  56 ++++++-
 flashrom.c             |  17 +-
 spi.h                  |   8 +-
 spi25.c                | 164 +++++++++++++++----
 spi25_statusreg.c      | 416 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 spi25_statusreg.h      | 115 ++++++++++++++
 statusreg_layouts.c    | 320 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 writeprotect.c         | 405 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 writeprotect.h         |  40 +++++
 writeprotect_layouts.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++
 15 files changed, 2083 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 spi25_statusreg.h
 create mode 100644 statusreg_layouts.c
 create mode 100644 writeprotect.c
 create mode 100644 writeprotect.h
 create mode 100644 writeprotect_layouts.c

-- 
2.7.4





More information about the flashrom mailing list